Canadian Medical Association Journal

Background: Advance care planning (ACP) documentation, including living wills and durable power of attorney (DPOA), is intended to support goal concordant end of life care. However, it is unknown if comprehensive documentation confers additional benefits, and how these associations vary across clinical contexts. Methods: We used 2010 to 2022 Health and Retirement Study exit interview data to examine associations between ACP documentation and end of life care among U.S. adults aged 50 years and older. Documentation was categorized as none, one document (living will or DPOA), or two documents (both). Outcomes included intensive care unit (ICU) use, life sustaining treatment, hospice enrollment, and out-of-hospital death. Modified Poisson regression models were used to estimate adjusted risk ratios (aRRs), and temporal trends in documentation were assessed using joinpoint regression. Results: Among 5,622 decedents representing 23.2 million individuals, 42.7% had two documents and 28.9% had none, documentation increased substantially around 2014. Compared with no documentation, having any documentation was associated with lower likelihood of life-sustaining treatment (aRR=0.85, 95% CI: 0.74 to 0.98) and higher likelihood of hospice enrollment (aRR=1.43, 95% CI: 1.28 to 1.60) and out-of-hospital death (aRR=1.11, 95% CI: 1.06 to 1.18), but not ICU use. Having two documents showed similar patterns, with modest differences compared with one document after adjustment. Associations were stronger among decedents with expected death and attenuated among those with unexpected death. Conclusions: Comprehensive ACP documentation is associated with less aggressive end of life care and greater hospice use, though the incremental benefits of two documents are modest. Findings highlight the importance of documentation within care planning processes and the clinical context.

PurposeTo characterize maternal transport patterns in Iowa, a state with levels of maternal care and without formal perinatal regions, and assess whether transport decisions reflect efficient, risk-appropriate coordination. MethodsWe analyzed 2010-2023 Iowa birth records, which included 2,251 maternal transports between obstetric facilities across 106 unique routes. We characterized transport patterns and applied a community detection algorithm to identify "communities" of obstetric facilities that disproportionately transport among themselves. FindingsSuburban and rural counties have elevated transport rates compared to urban counties. 2,189 transports (97%) were from lower-to higher-level facilities. Among these, 2,037 (93%) were to Level III tertiary care centers. 567 transports (25.2%) bypassed a closer facility offering an equivalent or higher level of care than its destination facility. Health system affiliation was associated with bypassing transport, indicating potential organizational rather than purely geographic drivers of transport decisions. Three "communities" of obstetric facilities largely shaped by geographic proximity were identified. ConclusionsAlthough Iowa does not have formal perinatal regions, patterns of maternal transport are mostly in line with three de facto regions. Some potential inefficiencies were identified, such as obstetric facilities transporting to a farther facility when a closer facility offered the same level of care or higher. These findings may help identify opportunities to enhance care coordination among obstetric facilities, optimize maternal transport networks, and improve regionalization of maternal care.

ImportanceGuideline-concordant care for young children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) includes recommending parent training in behavior management (PTBM) as first-line treatment. However, assessing guideline adherence through manual chart review is time-consuming and costly, limiting scalable and timely quality-of-care measurement. ObjectiveTo evaluate the accuracy and explainability of large language models (LLMs) in identifying PTBM recommendations in pediatric electronic health record (EHR) notes as a scalable alternative to manual chart review. Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis retrospective cohort study was conducted in a community-based pediatric healthcare network in California consisting of 27 primary care clinics. The study cohort included children aged 4-6 years with [≥] 2 primary care visits between 2020-2024 and ICD-10 diagnoses of ADHD or ADHD symptoms (n=542 patients). Clinical notes from the first ADHD-related visit were included. A stratified subset of 122 notes, including all cases with model disagreement, was manually annotated to assess model performance in identifying PTBM recommendations and rank model explanations. ExposuresAssessment and plan sections of clinical notes were analyzed using three generative large language models (Claude-3.5, GPT-4o, and LLaMA-3.3-70B) to identify the presence of PTBM recommendations and generate explanatory rationales and documentation evidence. Main Outcomes and MeasuresModel performance in identifying PTBM recommendations (measured by sensitivity, positive predictive value (PPV), and F1-score) and qualitative explainability ratings of model-generated rationales (based on the QUEST framework). ResultsAll three models demonstrated high performance compared to expert chart review. Claude-3.5 showed balanced performance (sensitivity=0.89, PPV=0.95, and F1-score=0.92) and ranked highest in explainability. LLaMA3.3-70B achieved sensitivity=0.91, PPV=0.89, and F1-score=0.90, ranking second for explainability. GPT-4o had the highest PPV [0.97] but lowest sensitivity [0.82], with an F1-score of 0.89 and the lowest explainability ranking. Based on classifications from the best-performing model, Claude-3.5, 26.4% (143/542) of patients had documented PTBM recommendations at their first ADHD-related visit. Conclusions and RelevanceLLMs can accurately extract guideline-concordant clinician recommendations for non-pharmacological ADHD treatment from unstructured clinical notes while providing clear explanations and supporting evidence. Evaluating model explainability as part of LLM implementation for medical chart review tasks can promote transparent and scalable solutions for quality-of-care measurement.

Background Persons experiencing homelessness (PEH) have a 2-3-fold greater risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality compared with domiciled counterparts. Evidence has repeatedly shown elevated chronic disease burden, reduced access to many types of care, and lower utilization of medication to control CVD risk factors in clinical settings dedicated to providing health care to PEH. There are federally funded health clinics targeting barriers to access for patient populations experiencing homelessness in place. These clinics are frequently overwhelmed and limited by their scope to primary care despite well documented burdens of co- and tri-morbid conditions. There is scarce evidence on differences between access, quality, and experiences of care delivered relative to other safety-net models. Method The 2022 Health Center Patient Survey (HCPS) was collected on behalf of the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA). The HCPS is a nationally representative, three-staged, sample-based survey collected via 1:1 interview with clinic patients. The survey assessed sociodemographics, health conditions and behaviors, access to and utilization of care, and patients? experiences with comprehensive services they received at HRSA-funded Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs), including community health centers (CHC), healthcare for the homeless (HCH) clinics, and public housing primary care (PHPC) clinics. One hundred and three unique awardees and 318 health center sites were recruited, and 4,414 patient interviews were completed. Investigators analyzed patient characteristics and multiple survey items related to AHA?s Essential 8 metrics for differences between HCH and CHC patient responses. Results HCH clinics had fewer elderly patients (~7%) than CHCs (~17%). Reported 7-day physical activity measures, average sleep below 7 hours per day, and Lifetime smoking (>100 cigarettes; OR=4.2, p<0.001) were all greatest among HCH patients. Fewer HCH patients reported ever having or recent lipid tests (both p<0.001). HCH patients were more likely to report hypertension (p=0.003) but less likely to report receiving nutrition advice (all p<0.05). HCH patients were less likely to be taking medication even if it was prescribed (p<0.001). Adjustments for differences in age or CVD history were able to explain some observed differences but increased the magnitude of other disparities. Conclusions CVD burden differs across the various HRSA funding mechanisms for clinics, as do demographics and multiple metrics of health behaviors and biomarkers of cardiovascular health. Greater disease burden in HCH patients is likely compounded by increased risk factors and underperformance in providing health education interventions.

Objective Cerebral palsy (CP) affects approximately 1 million Americans and 18 million individuals worldwide, yet contemporary US epidemiologic data remains limited. We aimed to use Cerebral Palsy Research Network (CPRN) clinical registry to describe demographics and clinical characteristics of individuals with CP across the US and determine associations with gross motor function and genetic etiology. Methods Registry subjects were included if they had clinician-confirmed CP and prospectively entered data for Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) Level, gestational age, genetic etiology, CP distribution, and tone/movement types. Logistic regression was used to determine which of these variables plus race, sex, ethnicity, and age were associated with GMFCS level and genetic etiology. Results A total of 9,756 children and adults with CP from 22 CPRN sites met inclusion criteria. Participants were predominantly White (73.0%), male (57.3%), non-Hispanic (87.8%), and younger than 18 years (73.7%). Most were classified as GMFCS levels I-III (55.6%), born preterm (52.8%), had spasticity (83.8%), and had quadriplegia (41.9%); 12.2% were identified as having a genetic etiology. Tone/movement types, CP distribution, and gestational age were significantly associated with both GMFCS level and genetic etiology (p<0.001). Compared to White individuals, Black individuals were more likely to have greater gross motor impairment (p<0.001). Conclusion In this large US cohort, clinical and demographic factors, including race, were associated with gross motor function and genetic etiology in CP. These findings highlight persistent disparities and demonstrate the value of a national clinical registry for informing prognostication, quality improvement efforts, and targeted genetic testing strategies.

Importance Missed outpatient appointments, including no-shows and cancellations, may disrupt continuity of care and be associated with worse outcomes, but long-term system-wide patterns and clinical implications are not well characterized. Objective To characterize variation in missed appointment rates in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) over time and by geographic location, visit modality, and preexisting conditions, and to evaluate associations between missed appointment rates and adverse outcomes among veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) or traumatic brain injury (TBI). Design Cohort study using VHA Corporate Data Warehouse outpatient appointment data from January 1, 2000, through December 31, 2024. Setting National integrated health care system of the VHA. Participants System analysis includes all scheduled outpatient appointments with a valid status, and outcome analysis includes veterans with PTSD (n = 1 429 890) or TBI (n = 554 553), diagnosed before 2023. Exposures For system -level analyses, missed appointment rates were calculated. In outcome analyses, 2023 missed appointment rates were categorized into tertiles within the cohort and appointment type. Main Outcomes and Measures One year risks of all-cause hospitalization, all-cause mortality, and hospitalization or death beginning January 1, 2024. Results Among 2,162,520,880 outpatient appointments from 2000 to 2024, 6.5% were no-shows and 25.4% were canceled. Across facilities, no-show rates ranged from 3.5% to 14.1%, patient-initiated cancellation rates from 9.7% to 26.0%, and clinic-initiated cancellation rates from 8.5% to 17.9%. In 2023, veterans with amputation, Parkinson disease, PTSD, or TBI had higher missed appointment rates than veterans without these conditions. Among veterans with PTSD, the highest no-show tertile, compared with none, was associated with higher mortality (HR, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.84-1.98) and hospitalization or death (HR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.05-1.08). Among veterans with TBI, the highest no-show tertile was associated with hospitalization or death (HR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.61-1.69). Conclusions and Relevance Missed outpatient appointments were common in the VHA and varied substantially across facilities and over time. Among veterans with PTSD or TBI, higher missed appointment rates, particularly no-shows, were associated with increased risks of hospitalization and mortality, suggesting that these patterns may help identify high-risk veterans for targeted outreach.

BACKGROUND Point-of-care (POC) high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) testing has the potential to expedite decision-making and reduce emergency department (ED) length of stay for patients presenting with possible myocardial infarction (MI) by ensuring that results are consistently available when looked for by clinicians. We assessed the real-life effectiveness and safety of implementing POC hs-cTn testing in the ED. METHODS We conducted a pragmatic, stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial. The control arm was usual care with an accelerated diagnostic pathway utilizing a single-sample rule-out step with a central laboratory hs-cTn assay. The intervention arm used the same pathway with a POC hs-cTnI. The primary effectiveness outcome was ED length of stay assessed using a generalized linear mixed model, and the safety outcome was 30-day MI or cardiac death. RESULTS Six sites participated with 59,980 ED presentations (44,747 individuals, 61{+/-}19 years, 49.5% female) from February 2023 to January 2025, in which 31,392 presentations were during the intervention arm. After adjustment for co-variates associated with length of stay, the intervention reduced length of stay by 13% (95% confidence intervals [CI], 9 to 16%. P<0.001), corresponding to a reduction of 47 minutes (95%CI, 33 to 61 minutes) from a mean length of stay in the control arm of 376 minutes. The 30-day MI or cardiac death rate was similar in the control and intervention arms (0.39% and 0.39% respectively, P=0.54). CONCLUSIONS Implementation of whole-blood hs-cTnI testing at the POC into an accelerated diagnostic pathway was safe and reduced length of stay in the ED compared with laboratory testing.

Importance: Health systems are increasingly adopting race-neutral cardiovascular risk prediction tools, yet no study has examined how these choices redistribute preventive treatment at the point of clinical decision-making, particularly for Black individuals who already bear a disproportionate cardiovascular burden. Objective: To evaluate how including race, substituting social determinants of health (SDoH), or excluding both reshapes cardiovascular risk classification, calibration, fairness, and clinical decisions. Design: Retrospective cohort study with repeated cross-validation and integrated decision-focused evaluation, using CARDIA study data with baseline measures from 2010 and cardiovascular outcomes through 2021. Setting: Community-based longitudinal cohort recruited across multiple U.S. cities. Participants: 3,241 Black and White adults without known cardiovascular disease at baseline. Main Outcomes and Measures: Three models predicting 10-year incident cardiovascular disease were compared on predictive performance, calibration, fairness metrics, and realized clinical utility at the ACC/AHA 7.5% preventive treatment threshold. Results: Among 3,241 participants (46% Black, mean age 50 years, 6.9% CVD incidence), overall performance was similar across models (AUC 0.762 to 0.768). Predictor choice substantially reshaped clinical decisions at the guideline threshold. The SDoH-based model improved parity metrics but produced systematic underprediction and concentrated new overtreatment among Black participants. The clinical-only model further improved parity metrics but generated new undertreatment, with four cases of untreated CVD and none avoided. No single evaluative dimension captured the full equity consequences. Conclusions and Relevance: Parity metrics improved under both race-neutral models, yet both produced clinical harms concentrated among Black participants not apparent in population-average metrics. The case for race removal has rested on conceptual grounds, but comprehensive empirical evaluation is necessary before health systems can be confident their model choices truly serve those most at risk.

Objectives: For suspected hip fractures, prehospital protocols directing patients to an orthopaedic centre rather than the nearest emergency department (ED) could reduce time-to-surgery but may impact EMS travel burden. This study evaluates the impact of transfer protocols by quantifying transport to hospitals from long term care (LTC) facilities across Ontario. Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional analysis of all Ontario LTC facilities and hospitals was performed. Two protocols were modeled: standard transfer to the nearest ED with subsequent transfer if required, and selective transfer based on Collingwood Hip Fracture Rule prehospital screening1 directly to the nearest orthopaedic services (orthoED). Median one-way travel distances were calculated from Google Maps. Results: In Ontario, 15.4% of LTC residents require hospital destination decisions because their nearest ED lacks orthopaedic services; for these facilities, median distances were 2.7km to the ED and 36.0km to the orthoED. Among the 52 LTC facilities where selective transfer was distance-optimal, it substantially reduced travel for patients with hip fracture (31.1km vs 49.6km; P<.01) while only modestly increasing travel for patients without hip fracture. Where standard transfer was distance-optimal, little travel difference was noted for patients with hip fracture, however false positive screened patients traveled significantly further to an orthoED. Greatest negative consequences of selective transfer lie in the 1.3% of residents living farthest (>100km) from an orthoED. Conclusions: EMS direct transportation to hospitals with orthopaedics may improve hip fracture care but can increase EMS burden due to patients identified falsely as having a hip fracture, particularly in remote communities.

We evaluated 2024/25 KP.2 vaccine effectiveness (VE) against COVID-19 hospitalization among adults >60 years old eligible for publicly-funded vaccination during fall and/or spring campaigns in the province of Quebec, Canada. We included Quebec residents tested for COVID-19-compatible symptoms in an acute-care hospital between October 13, 2024 (epi-week 2024-42) and August 23, 2025 (2025-34), linking vaccine, hospital, chronic diseases and laboratory administrative records to assess VE through test-negative design. We compared the odds of being COVID-19 test-positive versus test-negative among vaccinated versus non-vaccinated participants, adjusting for sex, age, comorbidities, place of residence, and epidemiological week. Overall, 49,949 (43%) participants were vaccinated. Over an analysis period spanning up to ten months, including median time since vaccination of 16 weeks (interquartile range 9-24 weeks), VE was 34% overall, declining from 43% <8 weeks to negligible by the 32nd week post-vaccination. Findings confirm meaningful but short-lived COVID-19 vaccine protection against hospitalization in older adults.

Background/Objectives: Women+ (e.g., women and individuals assigned female at birth) experience disproportionate health risks and persistent gaps in access to care, despite regionally coordinated health systems. Women+ health research remains significantly underfunded and understudied, contributing to inequities in diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes. This study aims to collaboratively identify and prioritize the most pressing unanswered research questions related to women+ health in the Maritime provinces of Canada. Methods: This study will use a modified Priority Setting Partnership (PSP) methodology based on the James Lind Alliance framework. A mixed-methods participatory approach will be used, including bilingual online surveys (French, English) and a one-day consensus workshop. Participants will include women+, healthcare professionals, researchers, policymakers, and the public residing in the Maritime provinces (Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, and Prince Edward Island). An initial survey will collect research uncertainties through open-ended questions. A second interim survey will rank verified uncertainties, followed by a facilitated workshop to achieve consensus on the Top 10 research priorities. Qualitative data will be analyzed using content analysis, and descriptive statistics will summarize participant demographics. Anticipated Results: This project is expected to generate a collaboratively developed, evidence-informed Top 10 list of research priorities for women+ health in the Maritimes. The process will also identify thematic gaps in existing research and assess feasibility considerations to inform future study design and implementation. Conclusions: By centering women+ voices and engaging diverse interest holders, this study will establish a shared regional research agenda to guide future research, funding, and policy initiatives for women+ health research.

Objectives: Introducing a new covariate adjustment method for hierarchical outcomes using ordinal logistic regression, comparing it with existing approaches, and assessing whether adjustment improves power in randomized trials with hierarchical outcomes. Methods: We developed an ordinal regression-based method for covariate adjustment of the win ratio and compared it with three alternatives: probability index models, inverse probability weighting, and a randomization-based estimator. Methods were applied to the EMPEROR-Preserved rial and tested through extensive simulations involving two common hierarchical outcome structures: time-to-event composites, and composites combining time-to-event with quantitative measures. Simulations assessed impacts on estimates, standard errors, and power across prognostic and non-prognostic settings. Results: In RCT data and simulations, covariate adjustment consistently increased power when adjusting for prognostic baseline variables. Gains were comparable to or greater than those in conventional Cox models, with no power loss for non-prognostic covariates. Our ordinal approach performed similarly to existing methods while providing interpretable covariate effect estimates. Adjusting for baseline values of quantitative components yielded power gains according to the baseline-to-follow-up correlation. Conclusions: Covariate adjustment for prognostic variables meaningfully improves efficiency in win ratio analyses for hierarchical outcomes. Our ordinal method is easily implemented and facilitates covariate effect interpretation. We recommend the broader adoption of covariate adjustment and our ordinal method in randomized trials using hierarchical outcomes.

BackgroundTimely cancer diagnosis in children and adolescents is critical to improving outcomes, yet substantial variation in diagnostic intervals persists across cancer types and care settings. We aimed to quantify time to diagnosis and assess variations by patient, demographic, and system-level factors. MethodsWe conducted a retrospective population-based study of children and adolescents aged 0-19 years diagnosed with one of 12 common cancers between 2010 and 2022 in Quebec, Canada. The diagnostic interval was defined as the time from first cancer-related healthcare encounter to diagnosis. We calculated medians and interquartile ranges (IQR) overall and by cancer type and used multivariable quantile regression to identify factors associated with time to diagnosis at the 25th, 50th, and 75th percentiles. ResultsAmong 2,927 individuals with cancer, diagnostic intervals varied by cancer type and age. Median intervals were longest for carcinomas (100 days; IQR 33-192) and shortest for leukemias (8 days; IQR 3-44). Compared with children living in Montreal, living in regional areas and other large urban centres was associated with longer 50th and 75th percentiles of time to diagnosis for hepatic and central nervous system (CNS) tumours. Diagnostic intervals were shorter in the post-pandemic period (2020-2022) across several cancer sites, with CNS tumours showing reductions across all quantiles. InterpretationDiagnostic timeliness differed by cancer type, age, and rurality, but not by sex, material, or social deprivation. The shorter diagnostic intervals observed in the post-pandemic period suggest that pandemic-related changes in care pathways may have expedited diagnosis for some cancers.

BackgroundIn long-term care facilities (LTCFs), close-contact identification often relies on staff recall and monitoring records because residents may be unable to self-report reliably. How these different record-generation processes relate to proximity-based sensor measurements in routine LTCF workflow remain unclear, and how such differences may influence contact-based decision-making in outbreak response is not well understood. MethodsWe conducted a five-day observational study in a Japanese LTCF using ultra-wideband (UWB) indoor positioning. Twenty-seven participants wore UWB tags, including 16 residents and 11 staff members; 10 staff members completed questionnaires. We compared UWB-derived proximity with questionnaire-derived contacts from staff self-report and monitoring-based proxy records, and assessed directional discrepancies under multiple distance-time thresholds. ResultsQuestionnaire-based records and UWB-derived proximity showed different patterns of discrepancy across contact types. Within this facility, resident-related monitoring-based proxy records showed relatively small directional discrepancies, whereas staff self-reports tended to identify additional resident-staff contacts under the baseline threshold ([&le;]1.0 m for [&ge;]15 min). Several alternative thresholds were associated with discrepancies closer to zero than the baseline, although the apparent ranking varied by summary metric. ConclusionsIn this single-facility observational study, different contact-list generation processes were associated with different patterns of discrepancy relative to a proximity-based operational measure. These findings support interpretation in terms of workflow-specific contact-list generation rather than a single universally optimal threshold and may help inform facility-level review of contact identification practices in LTCFs. These findings support aligning contact identification strategies with facility-specific workflows to improve the feasibility and effectiveness of IPC practices in LTCFs.

Introduction: Smoking cessation after acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is a Class I recommendation, yet prescription pharmacotherapy use remains low and its real-world cardiovascular effectiveness when added to nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) is poorly characterized. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the TriNetX US Collaborative Network (67 healthcare organizations). Adults hospitalized with ACS who received NRT within one month, serving as a proxy for active smoking status, were identified. Two co-primary propensity-matched (1:1, 50 covariates, caliper 0.10 SD) comparisons evaluated bupropion + NRT and varenicline + NRT individually versus NRT alone; a supportive analysis evaluated combined pharmacotherapy versus NRT alone. All-cause mortality was the primary endpoint. Secondary outcomes included MACE, heart failure exacerbations, major bleeding, TIA/stroke, emergency rehospitalizations, and cardiac rehabilitation utilization, assessed at 6 months and 1 year via Kaplan-Meier analysis. Hazard ratios (HRs) greater than 1.0 indicate higher hazard in the NRT-only group. Results: After matching, the combined analysis comprised 8,574 pairs, the bupropion analysis 4,654 pairs, and the varenicline analysis 2,126 pairs. At 1 year, the combined pharmacotherapy group had significantly lower all-cause mortality (HR 1.26, 95% CI 1.16-1.37), MACE (HR 1.16, 95% CI 1.12-1.21), heart failure exacerbations (HR 1.16, 95% CI 1.08-1.25), major bleeding (HR 1.18, 95% CI 1.08-1.28), and greater cardiac rehabilitation utilization (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.74-0.92; all p < 0.001). TIA/stroke did not differ significantly. Six-month results were consistent. Both varenicline and bupropion individually showed lower mortality and MACE. A urinary tract infection falsification endpoint showed no between-group differences, supporting matching validity. The pharmacotherapy group had higher rates of new-onset depression, driven predominantly by bupropion recipients. Conclusions: In this propensity-matched real-world analysis, adding prescription smoking cessation pharmacotherapy to NRT after ACS was associated with lower mortality and fewer adverse cardiovascular events, supporting broader integration into post-ACS care pathways.

Background: Preterm births contribute to approximately 35% of neonatal deaths globally, with an estimated 13.4 million infants born prematurely each year. Despite this substantial burden, limited evidence exists on time to discharge and its determinants among preterm neonates admitted to Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICUs), particularly in rural Ugandan settings. This study aimed to investigate time to discharge and associated factors among preterm neonates admitted to Kiwoko Hospital in Nakaseke District, Uganda. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using secondary data from Kiwoko Hospital on preterm neonates admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) between 2020 and 2021 (n = 847). The cumulative incidence function was used to estimate the probability of discharge within 28 days of admission, accounting for competing events. A Fine and Gray sub-distribution hazard regression model was fitted to identify factors associated with time to discharge. Results: Of the 847 preterm admissions, 70.1% were discharged alive within 28 days. The median time to discharge was 14 days. The cumulative incidence of discharge by 28 days was 68%, accounting for competing events. During follow-up, 165 neonates did not complete the 28-day period, including 88 deaths. Factors significantly associated with time to discharge included place of delivery (SHR: 0.62; 95% CI: 0.53-0.73; p<0.001), maternal residence in other districts (SHR: 0.69; 95% CI: 0.48-0.99; p=0.044), extreme preterm (SHR: 0.05; 95% CI: 0.03-0.09; p<0.001), very preterm (SHR: 0.18; 95% CI: 0.14-0.25; p<0.001), moderate preterm (SHR: 0.59; 95% CI: 0.46-0.76; p<0.001), triplet births (SHR: 0.40; 95% CI: 0.23-0.68; p=0.001), 2-4 ANC visits (SHR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.56-0.87; p=0.002), <=1 ANC visit (SHR: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.49-0.85; p=0.002), respiratory distress syndrome (SHR: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.48-0.74; p<0.001), and birth trauma (SHR: 2.62; 95% CI: 1.60-4.29; p<0.001). Conclusions: Respiratory distress syndrome, fewer antenatal care visits, out-of-district residence, and higher degrees of prematurity were associated with prolonged time to discharge among preterm neonates. Strengthening antenatal care utilization and improving access to quality neonatal care in underserved areas may enhance discharge outcomes.

ObjectivesRising temperatures are a major climate-related hazard for U.S. workers, increasing heat-related illness and a broad range of occupational injuries through indirect pathways often overlooked in economic evaluations. We examined the association between temperature and occupational injury and illness and quantified heat-attributable injuries (including illnesses) and costs in New York State. MethodsWe conducted a time-stratified case-crossover study of 591,257 workers compensation (WC) claims during the warm season (2016-2024). Daily maximum temperature was linked to injury date and county and modeled using natural cubic splines, with effect modification by industry and worker characteristics. ResultsInjury risk increased with temperature, becoming statistically significant at approximately 78{degrees}F. Relative to 65{degrees}F, injury odds increased to 1.06 (95% CI: 1.01-1.10) at 80{degrees}F, 1.12 (1.07-1.18) at 90{degrees}F, and 1.17 (1.11-1.23) at 95{degrees}F. Overall, 5.0% of claims (2,322 annually) were attributable to heat. At temperatures [&ge;]80{degrees}F, an estimated 1,729 excess injuries occurred annually, generating approximately $46 million in WC costs. An estimated $3.2 million to $36.1 million in medical expenditures were associated with incomplete claims, likely borne outside the WC system. ConclusionsThese findings demonstrate substantial economic costs not fully captured within WC and support workplace heat protections as a cost-containment strategy that can reduce health care spending and strengthen workforce resilience.

Background Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI) is a core strategy for strengthening health systems, yet documentation and monitoring of CQI activities remain fragmented in many low- and middle-income country (LMIC) settings. In Jamaica, CQI has been institutionalized across priority programs, but it largely relies on paper-based tools and basic digital platforms that limit timely learning and oversight. To address these gaps, Jamaicas Ministry of Health and Wellness (MOHW), in collaboration with the Caribbean Training and Education Centre for Health (C-TECH), adapted a web-based CQI application using a participatory, human-centered design approach. Methods We conducted a formative, convergent mixed-methods evaluation across 24 healthcare facilities to assess early-stage implementation of the CQI app. Guided by the Implementation Outcomes Framework, we examined acceptability, adoption, appropriateness, and feasibility. Quantitative data were collected through a structured survey of healthcare workers (n=43), and qualitative data were gathered through five focus group discussions (n=33) and three key informant interviews with CQI leads. Survey data were summarized descriptively, and qualitative data were analyzed using rapid qualitative analysis. Findings were integrated using joint displays. Results Survey findings indicated moderate to high perceived acceptability and appropriateness of the CQI app, with 70% of participants reporting that it saved time and 67% noting that it aligned with facility goals. However, 19% reported never using it. Qualitative findings highlighted the apps value for improving CQI documentation, visualizing trends, and supporting supervisory oversight. Key barriers to sustained adoption included inconsistent internet connectivity, limited follow-up training, unclear team roles, and challenges integrating app use into routine workflows. Leadership engagement and alignment with existing CQI structures emerged as critical enablers. Conclusion This formative evaluation suggests that a digitally enabled CQI platform can strengthen documentation and oversight of quality improvement activities in resource-constrained health systems when embedded within supportive organizational and infrastructural contexts. Addressing foundational system readiness, including leadership engagement, capacity-building, and workflow integration, will be essential to realizing the CQI apps potential in Jamaica and similar LMIC settings.

Prenatal depression is a substantial contributor to maternal morbidity, and screening is an entry point to psychiatric assessment and treatment during pregnancy. Following updated guidelines and quality metrics for prenatal depression screening, we evaluated whether screening uptake differed by preferred language within a large U.S. healthcare system. We used electronic health record data to identify a retrospective cohort of deliveries at or beyond 20 weeks gestation in 2019-2024. We used logistic regression with a language-year interaction to estimate the adjusted marginal probabilities of screening by language preference. Among 99,526 pregnancies (82,632 individuals), screening increased substantially over time but increases differed across language groups (p<0.001). In 2019, screening probabilities were similar (English 0.50; Spanish 0.48; Another Language 0.50). By 2024, probabilities diverged (English 0.81; Spanish 0.66; Another Language 0.71). Unequal screening uptake can systematically under-identify prenatal depression among patients with non-English language preference, with implications for equitable access to psychiatric care.

Background Use of oral cholera vaccine (OCV) is globally recommended as a public health response to cholera outbreaks, alongside water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) interventions. Estimating vaccine effectiveness during emergencies in low-and middle-income countries is challenging because vaccination campaigns are often implemented over short time frames, while individual-level data are frequently incomplete due to constraints in infrastructure, resources and data systems. There is a need for pragmatic approaches that can generate timely, policy-relevant evidence using routinely collected data. Methods We analysed routine surveillance data from a large 2022-2023 cholera outbreak in Blantyre District, Malawi. The EpiEstim framework was used to generate estimates of the time-varying reproduction number (Rt) from line-listed case data. We modelled changes in Rt as a function of cumulative OCV coverage using a log-linear framework and propagated uncertainty through posterior sampling. Lagged WASH exposure variables were incorporated in the model to generate adjusted vaccine effectiveness estimates and to explore potential interaction effects. Sensitivity analyses assessed robustness to alternative lag structures. Findings The Blantyre outbreak was characterised by an initial period of low-level transmission followed by a sharp increase in cases from late November 2022, after which transmission declined steadily through April 2023. This decline coincided with the implementation of a reactive OCV campaign. The majority of the cases were among middle-aged men living in urban Blantyre. The unadjusted vaccine-associated reduction in transmission was estimated at 53.52% (95% credible interval (CrI):42.5-64.1%). After adjusting for a 7-day rolling average WASH activity, total vaccine effectiveness increased to 62.1% (95% CrI: 49.3-74.9%). Sensitivity analyses using alternative lag structures for WASH exposure produced comparable adjusted estimates. Interpretation Implementation of OCV contributed to a substantial reduction in cholera transmission during the outbreak. This study demonstrates a feasible approach for estimating vaccine-attributable impact whilst accounting for public health and social measures, such as WASH interventions. The methods described will be useful in outbreaks where classical observational designs are not possible, providing actionable evidence to policy makers for outbreak response in resource-limited settings.